Meaning of Terms Used in Policy LC19
|
|
Appendix 10 For information only |
|
The scientific criteria explained below relate primarily to the current or potential intrinsic value of the site or feature for wildlife or for geological/geomorphological conservation. The community criteria relate primarily to its current or potential social importance. Both sets are inter-related (e.g. a site's naturalness may contribute to its visual appeal, amenity importance, educational and cultural value). They are of particular use when assessing the relative importance of sites or features of a similar type (for example, limestone grasslands). Scientific criteria These are based substantially on the 10 criteria identified in 'A Nature
Conservation Review' (Ratcliffe D A, 1977) widely recognised as the basis
for assessing the nature conservation value of sites in Great Britain. |
|
| |
Size - sites or species'
populations which are large. |
Diversity/Richness - sites which are
diverse in types of habitat, plant/animal communities and individual species. |
|
Rarity - habitats, habitat mosaics, plant/animal
communities or species which are rare or scarce internationally/nationally/within
the National Park. Reference will be made to local Red Data Book lists
in assessing species' rarity. |
|
Fragility - sites/species/features which
are easily damaged or under threat, particularly habitats/species which
are declining or have declined. |
|
Irreplaceability - features which are
impossible or difficult to replace within a reasonable timescale. Most
semi-natural habitats of importance will be considered irreplaceable,
as will sites which are relatively isolated from similar features (thus
preventing natural recolonisation). Translocation or habitat creation
will not be regarded as adequate mitigation unless it can clearly be demonstrated
that these measures will take full account of all important features of
the site, including scientific and community criteria. |
|
Naturalness - sites where the complement
of habitats/communities/species present has not been excessively influenced
by the activities of people. Sites with a good complement of 'habitat
indicator species', compared to 'disturbance-indicative species' or species
which are not locally native, will be regarded as important in this context. |
|
Position in Ecological/Geographical Unit
- sites which are considered important 'stepping stones' or situated in
'wildlife corridors', important for dispersal/migration/colonisation by
species (examples of important features include river corridors, pond
clusters, limestone dales, cloughs and hedgerow/woodland networks). Sites
of importance in maintaining the national or Park-wide range of a habitat/species. |
|
Potential value - sites/features which
could be of particular nature conservation importance with limited enhancement,
and where it is likely that this will be implemented within a reasonable
timescale; sites which have supported important features in the past,
and where the reinstatement of those features is both feasible and of
particular importance to the conservation of that habitat/species within
the National Park. |
|
Typicalness/representativeness - features
which contribute significantly to the 'local distinctiveness' of the National
Park, or areas within the National Park, by being typical, characteristic
or representative of the Peak District or particular areas of the Peak
District. |
|
Historical continuity - 'Ancient' or
long-established habitats (such as ancient woodland, unimproved species-rich
grassland). Such features will be regarded as irreplaceable. The presence
of species regarded locally as "indicators" of ancient habitats
will be considered in assessing this criterion. |
|
Geological/Geomorphological importance
- sites identified as Regionally Important Geological Sites (RIGS), or
considered to be of equivalent importance. |
|
Community criteriaThese are based substantially on criteria widely adopted in other Nature
Conservation Strategies and Development Plans in Britain. To qualify under
any of these community criteria, the wildlife/geological/geomorphological
features of a site must be an important element in its community value. |
|
Landscape importance and visual appeal
- sites which include characteristic, distinctive or prominent landscape
features, or where features of the site are of high intrinsic appeal. |
|
Recreational/amenity importance - sites
of particular recreation or amenity value, including provision of a range
of distinctive 'wildlife experiences' throughout the National Park. Sites
which are of particular value to local people or to visitors. |
|
Educational value - sites which are of
particular educational value. |
|
Cultural value - sites which include
or contribute to an important historical landscape element. These may
include 'relic' habitats which were once widespread locally but are now
rare (e.g. limestone heath); habitats dependent on past or declining human
management (e.g. flower-rich haymeadows); 'ancient' or long-established
habitats; or sites where wildlife features are an important element of
local customs, lores or traditional place-names (e.g. "Ravenstor",
"Hollin", relic moorland vegetation on areas such as Harthill
Moor). |
|
Recorded History - sites subject to long-term
studies. |
|
Potential value - sites/features which could be of particular community importance with limited enhancement, and where it is likely that this will be implemented within a reasonable timescale. |
|
|
|

